Greetings!
You are in for a winding exploration.
We started with a sneaky question — choosing individual or collective. So, flow found a way out of the duality.
What started as a philosophical, although somewhat experimental, inquiry into utopia and egoless society got shapeshifted by the feminine that it was suggested: “says ‘yes, and.’ Improv might just have been developed by women.”
So what would it look like if there is no need to choose “either-or”? And how do we hold space for both polarities at the same time? Is utopia coming soon? (We wish).
We cherish your presence, and joining us in flowing.
Irina, Polina and Yulia
These conversations are open explorations, that become richer with time and participation of others. We’d be thrilled to have you participate, if there was something that touched you. By commenting here, or sending us a message.
Some Things That Wanted to Be Said:
“Sensing into this without making sense — this is what it felt like.”
“If currently individuality is being packaged in the same patterns and the same ways of being, then wouldn’t Utopia be actually the opposite of both individuality and collectiveness?”
“Sometimes you need to limit yourself to start appreciating something in a new light.”
“What can emerge if we hold these two positions together?”
“The feminine just hijacked the conversation — and maybe that’s exactly what needed to happen.”
“These words were not created for me. They do not describe the operating self of me.”
“What if individuality and collectivism aren’t opposites — but a duality the feminine has always known how to hold?”
“Maybe we don’t need a new utopia. Maybe we need a new language first.”
“The masculine says ‘yes, but.’ The feminine says ‘yes, and.’ Improv might just have been developed by women.”
Let it flow,
Polina, Irina, and Yulya
📍Chapters
Chapters
00:00 Intro
01:16 Welcome & the question: individual vs collective — who wins?
05:52 The rules of the game: no “I,” no “you”
09:20 Game Round 1: What is Utopia?
15:35 Game Round 2: The human blockchain and the vibrating web
21:31 Why removing “I” changes what emerges
23:55 Creative limitation: dropping “I,” “you,” and “we”
25:00 The Dispossessed: can an egoless society function?
31:00 Ego as the “operating self”
34:12 Duality, non-duality, and the porous individual
39:56 Wouldn’t utopia welcome the ego?
41:28 The language problem: these words were made by men
43:25 Redefining “duality”
44:30 The feminine as “Yes, And”
48:56 How do we hold both polarities at once?
52:58 “Yes, And” as a principle of utopia
54:02 Spanish Revolution and the limits of hearing all voices
57:20 Tribes, time, and what “collective” really includes
1:00:40 Practicality as a masculine perspective
1:03:25 Wrapping up: lifting the creative limitations
1:04:50 The feminine “hijacked” this conversation
1:05:45 Takeaways: celebrating “Yes, And” — but who builds the roads?
1:09:10 More yang in the yin, more yin in the yang
1:10:31 Sensing into this without making sense
1:13:45 Invitation to listeners & farewell
1:15:05 Outro
Follow us on the Major Podcasting Platforms here:
Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.
Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support our work.
Find us here:
💌 Resources used under Creative Commons license:
Music “Echolocation” by airtone, source: CcMixter
